Review



human fc standard  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems human fc standard
    Human Fc Standard, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 17 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human fc standard/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 17 article reviews
    human fc standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    R&D Systems human fc standard
    Human Fc Standard, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human fc standard/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human fc standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human trem2 fc standard
    Human Trem2 Fc Standard, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human trem2 fc standard/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human trem2 fc standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Rockland Immunochemicals human igg f(ab) ́2 and fc standards
    Human Igg F(ab) ́2 And Fc Standards, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human igg f(ab) ́2 and fc standards/product/Rockland Immunochemicals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human igg f(ab) ́2 and fc standards - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Rockland Immunochemicals fc standards
    Fc Standards, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fc standards/product/Rockland Immunochemicals
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fc standards - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems human p75 ecd standard
    Baseline biomarker data.
    Human P75 Ecd Standard, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human p75 ecd standard/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human p75 ecd standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems human p75ecd standard
    Fig. 2: Longitudinal biomarker trajectories. Longitudinal trajectories of (a) serum NfL; (b) serum pNfH; and (c) urinary <t>p75ECD.</t> Y-axis shows percent change in each biomarker compared to baseline, plotted on a log scale. The faint grey dotted line illustrates the linear estimate of biomarker change over time. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CI), widened at later time points due to participant attrition over time and fewer biomarker data available. NfL and pNfH were measured in duplicate; p75ECD quantified with a median of 3 replicates. Single NfL and pNfH values from the 18-month visit of a single participant have been excluded (see footnote to Table 3 for detailed explanation).
    Human P75ecd Standard, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human p75ecd standard/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human p75ecd standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity anti human igg1 fc
    Suppressive effects of sICOS-SV on the costimulation of T cells. A, CHO-K1 cells were transduced with either ICOSL-expressing lentiviral vector or GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) as a negative control. Expression of ICOSL on the cell surface of CHO-K1 was examined by flow cytometry using anti-ICOSL (open histogram with solid line) or lentivirus GFP-empty vector (open histogram with dotted line). Isotype antibody was used as a negative control (filled histogram). B, ICOSL-expressing CHO-K1 cells were stained with ICOS-SV Ig (red line), control <t>IgG</t> Ig (blue line), or PD-1 Ig (orange line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Both soluble control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. GFP-empty vector-expression CHO-K1 cells stained with ICOS-SV Ig (green line) were used as another negative control for the binding assay. Isotype antibody control was used as a negative control (gray filled histogram). C, CD154 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. D, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD154 between two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. E, CD69 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. F, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD69 between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. G, CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Sample loading was normalized to total pan-Akt. H, T-cell proliferation was determined by a [ 3 H]-TdR thymidine incorporation assay. CHO cells transduced with empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare 3 H uptake between the two groups, respectively. *, P < 0.1. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. I, Schematic diagram of ICOS/ICOSL costimulatory T-cell proliferation, as well as the blocking function of the sICOS-SV. Depicted are the cytoplasmic tail sequences of ICOS-FL and sICOS-SV isoforms. The YMFM Src Homology 2 (SH2) binding motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the ICOS-FL is highlighted in pink. Upon ICOS engagement by the ICOSL on CHO cells, the unique YMFM motif recruits a p85a and a p50a subunits of PI3K, resulting in the elevated phosphorylation of Akt, thereby inducing PI3K activity. In contrast, the ICOS-SV, a truncated isoform lacking the YMFM motif in its cytoplasmic tail, cannot elicit phosphorylation of Akt. Consequently, it fails to promote T-cell proliferation. The secreted ICOS-SV (red) competes with membrane-bound ICOS for binding to ICOSL, thereby blocking the interaction between ICOSL and membrane ICOS. As a result, the sICOS-SV suppresses phosphorylation of Akt and T-cell proliferation, leading to the inhibition of T-cell immunity. The diagram was created with BioRender.com. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.
    Anti Human Igg1 Fc, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human igg1 fc/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human igg1 fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity human igg1 fc
    Suppressive effects of sICOS-SV on the costimulation of T cells. A, CHO-K1 cells were transduced with either ICOSL-expressing lentiviral vector or GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) as a negative control. Expression of ICOSL on the cell surface of CHO-K1 was examined by flow cytometry using anti-ICOSL (open histogram with solid line) or lentivirus GFP-empty vector (open histogram with dotted line). Isotype antibody was used as a negative control (filled histogram). B, ICOSL-expressing CHO-K1 cells were stained with ICOS-SV Ig (red line), control <t>IgG</t> Ig (blue line), or PD-1 Ig (orange line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Both soluble control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. GFP-empty vector-expression CHO-K1 cells stained with ICOS-SV Ig (green line) were used as another negative control for the binding assay. Isotype antibody control was used as a negative control (gray filled histogram). C, CD154 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. D, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD154 between two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. E, CD69 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. F, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD69 between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. G, CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Sample loading was normalized to total pan-Akt. H, T-cell proliferation was determined by a [ 3 H]-TdR thymidine incorporation assay. CHO cells transduced with empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare 3 H uptake between the two groups, respectively. *, P < 0.1. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. I, Schematic diagram of ICOS/ICOSL costimulatory T-cell proliferation, as well as the blocking function of the sICOS-SV. Depicted are the cytoplasmic tail sequences of ICOS-FL and sICOS-SV isoforms. The YMFM Src Homology 2 (SH2) binding motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the ICOS-FL is highlighted in pink. Upon ICOS engagement by the ICOSL on CHO cells, the unique YMFM motif recruits a p85a and a p50a subunits of PI3K, resulting in the elevated phosphorylation of Akt, thereby inducing PI3K activity. In contrast, the ICOS-SV, a truncated isoform lacking the YMFM motif in its cytoplasmic tail, cannot elicit phosphorylation of Akt. Consequently, it fails to promote T-cell proliferation. The secreted ICOS-SV (red) competes with membrane-bound ICOS for binding to ICOSL, thereby blocking the interaction between ICOSL and membrane ICOS. As a result, the sICOS-SV suppresses phosphorylation of Akt and T-cell proliferation, leading to the inhibition of T-cell immunity. The diagram was created with BioRender.com. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.
    Human Igg1 Fc, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human igg1 fc/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human igg1 fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Baseline biomarker data.

    Journal: eBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Baseline biomarker data.

    Article Snippet: Human p75 ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Clinical Proteomics

    Longitudinal biomarker trajectories.

    Journal: eBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Longitudinal biomarker trajectories.

    Article Snippet: Human p75 ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

    Longitudinal biomarker trajectories . Longitudinal trajectories of (a) serum NfL; (b) serum pNfH; and (c) urinary p75 ECD . Y-axis shows percent change in each biomarker compared to baseline, plotted on a log scale. The faint grey dotted line illustrates the linear estimate of biomarker change over time. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CI), widened at later time points due to participant attrition over time and fewer biomarker data available. NfL and pNfH were measured in duplicate; p75 ECD quantified with a median of 3 replicates. Single NfL and pNfH values from the 18-month visit of a single participant have been excluded (see footnote to <xref ref-type=Table 3 for detailed explanation). " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: eBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Longitudinal biomarker trajectories . Longitudinal trajectories of (a) serum NfL; (b) serum pNfH; and (c) urinary p75 ECD . Y-axis shows percent change in each biomarker compared to baseline, plotted on a log scale. The faint grey dotted line illustrates the linear estimate of biomarker change over time. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CI), widened at later time points due to participant attrition over time and fewer biomarker data available. NfL and pNfH were measured in duplicate; p75 ECD quantified with a median of 3 replicates. Single NfL and pNfH values from the 18-month visit of a single participant have been excluded (see footnote to Table 3 for detailed explanation).

    Article Snippet: Human p75 ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

    Prognostic markers of survival.

    Journal: eBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Prognostic markers of survival.

    Article Snippet: Human p75 ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Marker, Diagnostic Assay, Clinical Proteomics

    Baseline prognostic markers of functional decline.

    Journal: eBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Baseline prognostic markers of functional decline.

    Article Snippet: Human p75 ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Marker, Diagnostic Assay, Clinical Proteomics

    Estimated total sample size savings in a random slopes model of ALSFRS-R progression that includes the prognostic marker and covariate(s).

    Journal: eBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Estimated total sample size savings in a random slopes model of ALSFRS-R progression that includes the prognostic marker and covariate(s).

    Article Snippet: Human p75 ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Marker, Clinical Proteomics

    Fig. 2: Longitudinal biomarker trajectories. Longitudinal trajectories of (a) serum NfL; (b) serum pNfH; and (c) urinary p75ECD. Y-axis shows percent change in each biomarker compared to baseline, plotted on a log scale. The faint grey dotted line illustrates the linear estimate of biomarker change over time. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CI), widened at later time points due to participant attrition over time and fewer biomarker data available. NfL and pNfH were measured in duplicate; p75ECD quantified with a median of 3 replicates. Single NfL and pNfH values from the 18-month visit of a single participant have been excluded (see footnote to Table 3 for detailed explanation).

    Journal: EBioMedicine

    Article Title: Prognostic clinical and biological markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression: validation and implications for clinical trial design and analysis.

    doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105323

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2: Longitudinal biomarker trajectories. Longitudinal trajectories of (a) serum NfL; (b) serum pNfH; and (c) urinary p75ECD. Y-axis shows percent change in each biomarker compared to baseline, plotted on a log scale. The faint grey dotted line illustrates the linear estimate of biomarker change over time. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CI), widened at later time points due to participant attrition over time and fewer biomarker data available. NfL and pNfH were measured in duplicate; p75ECD quantified with a median of 3 replicates. Single NfL and pNfH values from the 18-month visit of a single participant have been excluded (see footnote to Table 3 for detailed explanation).

    Article Snippet: Human p75ECD standard was from R&D Systems (Lys29-Asn250; #367-NR).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

    Suppressive effects of sICOS-SV on the costimulation of T cells. A, CHO-K1 cells were transduced with either ICOSL-expressing lentiviral vector or GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) as a negative control. Expression of ICOSL on the cell surface of CHO-K1 was examined by flow cytometry using anti-ICOSL (open histogram with solid line) or lentivirus GFP-empty vector (open histogram with dotted line). Isotype antibody was used as a negative control (filled histogram). B, ICOSL-expressing CHO-K1 cells were stained with ICOS-SV Ig (red line), control IgG Ig (blue line), or PD-1 Ig (orange line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Both soluble control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. GFP-empty vector-expression CHO-K1 cells stained with ICOS-SV Ig (green line) were used as another negative control for the binding assay. Isotype antibody control was used as a negative control (gray filled histogram). C, CD154 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. D, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD154 between two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. E, CD69 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. F, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD69 between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. G, CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Sample loading was normalized to total pan-Akt. H, T-cell proliferation was determined by a [ 3 H]-TdR thymidine incorporation assay. CHO cells transduced with empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare 3 H uptake between the two groups, respectively. *, P < 0.1. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. I, Schematic diagram of ICOS/ICOSL costimulatory T-cell proliferation, as well as the blocking function of the sICOS-SV. Depicted are the cytoplasmic tail sequences of ICOS-FL and sICOS-SV isoforms. The YMFM Src Homology 2 (SH2) binding motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the ICOS-FL is highlighted in pink. Upon ICOS engagement by the ICOSL on CHO cells, the unique YMFM motif recruits a p85a and a p50a subunits of PI3K, resulting in the elevated phosphorylation of Akt, thereby inducing PI3K activity. In contrast, the ICOS-SV, a truncated isoform lacking the YMFM motif in its cytoplasmic tail, cannot elicit phosphorylation of Akt. Consequently, it fails to promote T-cell proliferation. The secreted ICOS-SV (red) competes with membrane-bound ICOS for binding to ICOSL, thereby blocking the interaction between ICOSL and membrane ICOS. As a result, the sICOS-SV suppresses phosphorylation of Akt and T-cell proliferation, leading to the inhibition of T-cell immunity. The diagram was created with BioRender.com. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.

    Journal: Cancer Immunology Research

    Article Title: Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Influence on Soluble and Membrane-Bound ICOS in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Blockade

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0702

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Suppressive effects of sICOS-SV on the costimulation of T cells. A, CHO-K1 cells were transduced with either ICOSL-expressing lentiviral vector or GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) as a negative control. Expression of ICOSL on the cell surface of CHO-K1 was examined by flow cytometry using anti-ICOSL (open histogram with solid line) or lentivirus GFP-empty vector (open histogram with dotted line). Isotype antibody was used as a negative control (filled histogram). B, ICOSL-expressing CHO-K1 cells were stained with ICOS-SV Ig (red line), control IgG Ig (blue line), or PD-1 Ig (orange line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Both soluble control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. GFP-empty vector-expression CHO-K1 cells stained with ICOS-SV Ig (green line) were used as another negative control for the binding assay. Isotype antibody control was used as a negative control (gray filled histogram). C, CD154 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. D, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD154 between two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. E, CD69 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. F, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD69 between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. G, CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Sample loading was normalized to total pan-Akt. H, T-cell proliferation was determined by a [ 3 H]-TdR thymidine incorporation assay. CHO cells transduced with empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare 3 H uptake between the two groups, respectively. *, P < 0.1. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. I, Schematic diagram of ICOS/ICOSL costimulatory T-cell proliferation, as well as the blocking function of the sICOS-SV. Depicted are the cytoplasmic tail sequences of ICOS-FL and sICOS-SV isoforms. The YMFM Src Homology 2 (SH2) binding motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the ICOS-FL is highlighted in pink. Upon ICOS engagement by the ICOSL on CHO cells, the unique YMFM motif recruits a p85a and a p50a subunits of PI3K, resulting in the elevated phosphorylation of Akt, thereby inducing PI3K activity. In contrast, the ICOS-SV, a truncated isoform lacking the YMFM motif in its cytoplasmic tail, cannot elicit phosphorylation of Akt. Consequently, it fails to promote T-cell proliferation. The secreted ICOS-SV (red) competes with membrane-bound ICOS for binding to ICOSL, thereby blocking the interaction between ICOSL and membrane ICOS. As a result, the sICOS-SV suppresses phosphorylation of Akt and T-cell proliferation, leading to the inhibition of T-cell immunity. The diagram was created with BioRender.com. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: After washing three times with FACS buffer (1× PBS + 2% FBS + 1 mmol/L EDTA), the T cells were then incubated with a fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human IgG1 Fc (M1310G05, BioLegend) or isotype control antibody (RTK2758, BioLegend) in 100 μL of FACS buffer for 30 minutes on ice ( ).

    Techniques: Transduction, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Negative Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Control, Binding Assay, Incubation, Two Tailed Test, Standard Deviation, Thymidine Incorporation Assay, Blocking Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Activity Assay, Membrane, Inhibition

    sICOS from melanoma patients inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation induced by GM-CSF–driven DCs in MLRs. A, CD4 + T cells (responders) were stimulated by allogeneic GM-CSF–driven MoDCs (stimulators: negative control DCs, DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-IgG, or DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-CD116) in MLRs. T cells were assessed for activation via flow cytometry using anti-ICOS (blue), anti-GITR (green), or anti-CD25 (gray). Isotype control antibodies were used as negative controls. B, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + ICOS + , CD4 + GITR + , and CD4 + CD25 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. C, Soluble ICOS levels were determined by ELISA using supernatants from the MLRs described above. D – E, Serum from sICOS-high and sICOS-negative patients were added to the MLRs, and T-cell proliferation ( D ) and CD69 expression ( E ) were evaluated. Additionally, sICOS was depleted from sICOS-high serum to assess its effects on T cells. F, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + CD69 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, not significant ( P > 0.05). Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown.

    Journal: Cancer Immunology Research

    Article Title: Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Influence on Soluble and Membrane-Bound ICOS in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Blockade

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0702

    Figure Lengend Snippet: sICOS from melanoma patients inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation induced by GM-CSF–driven DCs in MLRs. A, CD4 + T cells (responders) were stimulated by allogeneic GM-CSF–driven MoDCs (stimulators: negative control DCs, DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-IgG, or DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-CD116) in MLRs. T cells were assessed for activation via flow cytometry using anti-ICOS (blue), anti-GITR (green), or anti-CD25 (gray). Isotype control antibodies were used as negative controls. B, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + ICOS + , CD4 + GITR + , and CD4 + CD25 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. C, Soluble ICOS levels were determined by ELISA using supernatants from the MLRs described above. D – E, Serum from sICOS-high and sICOS-negative patients were added to the MLRs, and T-cell proliferation ( D ) and CD69 expression ( E ) were evaluated. Additionally, sICOS was depleted from sICOS-high serum to assess its effects on T cells. F, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + CD69 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, not significant ( P > 0.05). Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown.

    Article Snippet: After washing three times with FACS buffer (1× PBS + 2% FBS + 1 mmol/L EDTA), the T cells were then incubated with a fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human IgG1 Fc (M1310G05, BioLegend) or isotype control antibody (RTK2758, BioLegend) in 100 μL of FACS buffer for 30 minutes on ice ( ).

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Negative Control, Generated, Flow Cytometry, Control, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Standard Deviation

    Suppressive effects of sICOS-SV on the costimulation of T cells. A, CHO-K1 cells were transduced with either ICOSL-expressing lentiviral vector or GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) as a negative control. Expression of ICOSL on the cell surface of CHO-K1 was examined by flow cytometry using anti-ICOSL (open histogram with solid line) or lentivirus GFP-empty vector (open histogram with dotted line). Isotype antibody was used as a negative control (filled histogram). B, ICOSL-expressing CHO-K1 cells were stained with ICOS-SV Ig (red line), control IgG Ig (blue line), or PD-1 Ig (orange line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Both soluble control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. GFP-empty vector-expression CHO-K1 cells stained with ICOS-SV Ig (green line) were used as another negative control for the binding assay. Isotype antibody control was used as a negative control (gray filled histogram). C, CD154 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. D, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD154 between two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. E, CD69 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. F, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD69 between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. G, CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Sample loading was normalized to total pan-Akt. H, T-cell proliferation was determined by a [ 3 H]-TdR thymidine incorporation assay. CHO cells transduced with empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare 3 H uptake between the two groups, respectively. *, P < 0.1. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. I, Schematic diagram of ICOS/ICOSL costimulatory T-cell proliferation, as well as the blocking function of the sICOS-SV. Depicted are the cytoplasmic tail sequences of ICOS-FL and sICOS-SV isoforms. The YMFM Src Homology 2 (SH2) binding motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the ICOS-FL is highlighted in pink. Upon ICOS engagement by the ICOSL on CHO cells, the unique YMFM motif recruits a p85a and a p50a subunits of PI3K, resulting in the elevated phosphorylation of Akt, thereby inducing PI3K activity. In contrast, the ICOS-SV, a truncated isoform lacking the YMFM motif in its cytoplasmic tail, cannot elicit phosphorylation of Akt. Consequently, it fails to promote T-cell proliferation. The secreted ICOS-SV (red) competes with membrane-bound ICOS for binding to ICOSL, thereby blocking the interaction between ICOSL and membrane ICOS. As a result, the sICOS-SV suppresses phosphorylation of Akt and T-cell proliferation, leading to the inhibition of T-cell immunity. The diagram was created with BioRender.com. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.

    Journal: Cancer Immunology Research

    Article Title: Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Influence on Soluble and Membrane-Bound ICOS in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Blockade

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0702

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Suppressive effects of sICOS-SV on the costimulation of T cells. A, CHO-K1 cells were transduced with either ICOSL-expressing lentiviral vector or GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) as a negative control. Expression of ICOSL on the cell surface of CHO-K1 was examined by flow cytometry using anti-ICOSL (open histogram with solid line) or lentivirus GFP-empty vector (open histogram with dotted line). Isotype antibody was used as a negative control (filled histogram). B, ICOSL-expressing CHO-K1 cells were stained with ICOS-SV Ig (red line), control IgG Ig (blue line), or PD-1 Ig (orange line) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Both soluble control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. GFP-empty vector-expression CHO-K1 cells stained with ICOS-SV Ig (green line) were used as another negative control for the binding assay. Isotype antibody control was used as a negative control (gray filled histogram). C, CD154 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. D, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD154 between two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. E, CD69 expression was determined by FACS analysis. Isotype control antibody is shown in gray. Activated T cells treated with a suboptimal dose of anti-CD3 were incubated with control Ig + CHO-ICOSL − cells (CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector, blue), control Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (green), PD-1 Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (red), or ICOS-SV Ig + CHO-ICOSL + cells (yellow). Both control Ig and PD-1 Ig were used as negative controls. F, Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare expression of CD69 between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. G, CHO cells transduced with GFP-empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Sample loading was normalized to total pan-Akt. H, T-cell proliferation was determined by a [ 3 H]-TdR thymidine incorporation assay. CHO cells transduced with empty vector (CHO-ICOSL − ) were used as negative controls. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare 3 H uptake between the two groups, respectively. *, P < 0.1. Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown. I, Schematic diagram of ICOS/ICOSL costimulatory T-cell proliferation, as well as the blocking function of the sICOS-SV. Depicted are the cytoplasmic tail sequences of ICOS-FL and sICOS-SV isoforms. The YMFM Src Homology 2 (SH2) binding motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the ICOS-FL is highlighted in pink. Upon ICOS engagement by the ICOSL on CHO cells, the unique YMFM motif recruits a p85a and a p50a subunits of PI3K, resulting in the elevated phosphorylation of Akt, thereby inducing PI3K activity. In contrast, the ICOS-SV, a truncated isoform lacking the YMFM motif in its cytoplasmic tail, cannot elicit phosphorylation of Akt. Consequently, it fails to promote T-cell proliferation. The secreted ICOS-SV (red) competes with membrane-bound ICOS for binding to ICOSL, thereby blocking the interaction between ICOSL and membrane ICOS. As a result, the sICOS-SV suppresses phosphorylation of Akt and T-cell proliferation, leading to the inhibition of T-cell immunity. The diagram was created with BioRender.com. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: Monoclonal antibodies specific for CD3 (UCHT1), CD4 (RPA-T4), CD8 (HIT8a), CD28 (CD28.2), CD25 (BC96), ICOSL (2D3), CD14 (63D3), HLA-DR (L243), CD11C (3.9), CD80 (2D10), CD86 (BU63), CD83 (HB15e), human IgG1 Fc (QA19A42), GITR (108- ), CD154 , CD69 (FN50), ICOS (C398.4A), mouse IgG1 k istotype control (MOPC-21), mouse IgG2b k isotype control (MPC-11), mouse IgG2a k isotpe control (MOPC-173), and Armenian Hamster IgG isotype control (HTK888) were purchased from BioLegend.

    Techniques: Transduction, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Negative Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Control, Binding Assay, Incubation, Two Tailed Test, Standard Deviation, Thymidine Incorporation Assay, Blocking Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Activity Assay, Membrane, Inhibition

    sICOS from melanoma patients inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation induced by GM-CSF–driven DCs in MLRs. A, CD4 + T cells (responders) were stimulated by allogeneic GM-CSF–driven MoDCs (stimulators: negative control DCs, DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-IgG, or DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-CD116) in MLRs. T cells were assessed for activation via flow cytometry using anti-ICOS (blue), anti-GITR (green), or anti-CD25 (gray). Isotype control antibodies were used as negative controls. B, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + ICOS + , CD4 + GITR + , and CD4 + CD25 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. C, Soluble ICOS levels were determined by ELISA using supernatants from the MLRs described above. D – E, Serum from sICOS-high and sICOS-negative patients were added to the MLRs, and T-cell proliferation ( D ) and CD69 expression ( E ) were evaluated. Additionally, sICOS was depleted from sICOS-high serum to assess its effects on T cells. F, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + CD69 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, not significant ( P > 0.05). Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown.

    Journal: Cancer Immunology Research

    Article Title: Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Influence on Soluble and Membrane-Bound ICOS in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Blockade

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0702

    Figure Lengend Snippet: sICOS from melanoma patients inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation induced by GM-CSF–driven DCs in MLRs. A, CD4 + T cells (responders) were stimulated by allogeneic GM-CSF–driven MoDCs (stimulators: negative control DCs, DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-IgG, or DCs generated by GM-CSF/IL4 + anti-CD116) in MLRs. T cells were assessed for activation via flow cytometry using anti-ICOS (blue), anti-GITR (green), or anti-CD25 (gray). Isotype control antibodies were used as negative controls. B, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + ICOS + , CD4 + GITR + , and CD4 + CD25 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. C, Soluble ICOS levels were determined by ELISA using supernatants from the MLRs described above. D – E, Serum from sICOS-high and sICOS-negative patients were added to the MLRs, and T-cell proliferation ( D ) and CD69 expression ( E ) were evaluated. Additionally, sICOS was depleted from sICOS-high serum to assess its effects on T cells. F, Statistical analysis of the percentage of CD4 + CD69 + T-cell populations from different groups as described above. All data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments. Two-tailed unpaired t test was used between the two groups. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; ns, not significant ( P > 0.05). Standard deviation of the mean (SD) is shown.

    Article Snippet: Monoclonal antibodies specific for CD3 (UCHT1), CD4 (RPA-T4), CD8 (HIT8a), CD28 (CD28.2), CD25 (BC96), ICOSL (2D3), CD14 (63D3), HLA-DR (L243), CD11C (3.9), CD80 (2D10), CD86 (BU63), CD83 (HB15e), human IgG1 Fc (QA19A42), GITR (108- ), CD154 , CD69 (FN50), ICOS (C398.4A), mouse IgG1 k istotype control (MOPC-21), mouse IgG2b k isotype control (MPC-11), mouse IgG2a k isotpe control (MOPC-173), and Armenian Hamster IgG isotype control (HTK888) were purchased from BioLegend.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Negative Control, Generated, Flow Cytometry, Control, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Standard Deviation